The BBC is known for its history of Hinduphobia probably rooted in their forefathers’ racist hate does the obvious by giving a platform on their Sunday Morning Live show to this Rajiv SINha wearing a saffron scarf to fool the audiences that he’s some Hindu representative even though most Hindu temples, organisations and Hindus have never heard of him but he’s getting known to spew hinduphobic hatred being backed by Islamists and other hinduphobic hate groups.
He’s the UK’s representative of a US proxy known as the Hindus for Human Rights group which means minus the human rights of Hindus because they aren’t human.
They had stolen the HHR knowledge panel on Google, restricting our access to it, replacing our email, our website URL and our X- Twitter handle with theirs, to direct traffic away from Hindu Human Rights and push their Hinduphobic group’s algorithms till they got caught. This group is funded by Hinduphobic hate groups and is setting itself up across the world with these Indians with Hindu names as a cover. Just like colonialists used some locals to colonise across the world.
But the big question always remains does BBC ever do its research to find out who it’s giving the platform to?
So someone claiming to be Hindu is talking about Islamophobia but no mention of the hate and attacks on Hindus or the history of it but then goes pushing the Hinduphobic hate propaganda is suddenly the representative of all Hindus? Even though he has no backing of any Hindu temples, orgs or the Hindu community ? or is it the case ‘you all brown people look the same’ mentality is at play here ?
You don’t have to be Sherlock Holmes to work that one out there’s something suspicious about this individual where even by the way he is talking and moving there’s something not right with his lies when he goes on an attack on Hindus. Even a toddler could work out that one out that something doesn’t add up.
Hinduphobia was coined back in the UK as pointed out here, in 1866, in a work by Edward Sullivan, where he criticises James Mill for denying the wealth of India prior to Akhbar. The term was used by the media at first in the York Newspaper of Yorkshire, England on 20 March 1883. So it was in use often as most people were aware of the hate against Hindus then but somehow ‘miraculously’ it vanished and now the same media claim it was stolen from Islamophobia by imaginary Hindu Nationalists.
As Hindus, we want answers from the BBC and other media, especially the ones claiming to be ‘left, liberals’ progressives ‘ fighting racism while promoting Hinduphobic racism and religious hate via their brown faced servants. Or do thousands of Hindus have to turn up to knock on the door of Sunday Morning Live in London for answers?
Because so far the mindset of some of you ‘whites’ is ‘I’m not a racist because I love Indian food and sometimes do Yoga, but damn you Hindus talk about your human rights you turban-heads from Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom’.!!!
This is the respect you give to the hardworking Hindu community including the Gurkha regiment who are mostly Hindus and have died for this country by giving Hinduphobic hate preachers a platform.
1/
Video Player
2 /
Read more Exposing the malicious agenda of Rajiv Sinha and his “Hindus for Human Rights” organisation
3 /
